Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 03:39

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
'Disconnected' tyre should force Spanish GP strategy variety - The Race
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?
S&P Dow Jones Makes No Changes to S&P 500 in Quarterly Rebalance - Bloomberg
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Measles strikes at birth: Six Canadian newborns infected from unvaccinated mothers - Times of India
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
I'm British and feel ashamed of the crimes of British colonialism. What should I do?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Debitis voluptas voluptatem ea sit.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Nick And Vanessa Lachey Selling Encino Home For Millions - TMZ
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
'2nd Jupiter' exoplanet seen 60 light-years away photo of the day for June 23, 2025 - Space